Colomb v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington, Vermont, Inc.

Plaintiff: Edward Colomb
Defendant: Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington, Vermont, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2010cv00254
Filed: October 20, 2010
Court: Vermont District Court
Office: Burlington Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: William K. Sessions
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 28, 2012 59 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 46 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 54 Motion to Strike 53 Response to Reply to 46 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 55 Motion for Leave to File Surreply Memorandum re 46 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 9/28/2012. (law)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Colomb v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington, Vermont, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward Colomb
Represented By: Jerome F. O'Neill, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roman Catholic Diocese of Burlington, Vermont, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.