Sprayregen v. Bank of America, N.A.
Plaintiff: Paul Sprayregen
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Case Number: 2:2011cv00115
Filed: May 4, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Vermont
Office: Burlington Office
County: Chittenden
Presiding Judge: William K. Sessions
Nature of Suit: Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER granting in part and denying in part 32 Motion to Amend 1 Complaint ; granting 26 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 7/23/2012. (law)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sprayregen v. Bank of America, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Paul Sprayregen
Represented By: Adam P. Bergeron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A.
Represented By: Christopher D. Roy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?