King v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner

Plaintiff: Frank King, Jr.
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Case Number: 2:2012cv00277
Filed: December 12, 2012
Court: Vermont District Court
Office: Burlington Office
County: Franklin
Presiding Judge: John M. Conroy
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42:0405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
July 31, 2013 11 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION AND ORDER: The Court GRANTS, in part, Plaintiff's 5 MOTION for Order Reversing the Decision of the Commissioner and DENIES Defendant's 9 MOTION for Order Affirming the Decision of the Commissioner. Signed by Judge John M. Conroy on 7/31/2013. (hbc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frank King, Jr.
Represented By: Craig A. Jarvis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Represented By: Luis Pere, SAUSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.