Rheaume v. Pallito et al
| Allen Rheaume |
| Andrew Pallito, Mark Potanas, Cullen Bullard, Kris Goldstein, Samantha Clarke, Kim Bushey, Jim Gibson, Dale Crook, Larry Martineau and Tammy Kennison |
| 2:2015cv00135 |
| June 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Burlington Office |
| Orleans |
| John M. Conroy |
| William K. Sessions |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER Adopting 80 Report and Recommendation ; granting 68 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and 57 Second Amended Complaint is dismissed. A certificate of appealability is DENIED because the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of denial of a federal right. Furthermore, it is certified that any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 6/14/2016. (law)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER Adopting 58 Report and Recommendation denying as moot 47 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 6 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and denying 7 Motion to Appoint Counsel. A certificate of appealability is DENIED bec ause the petitioner has failed to make a substantial showing of denial of a federal right. Furthermore, it is certified that any appeal of this matter would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Judge William K. Sessions III on 11/18/2015. (jam)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
