Castegnaro v. State of Vermont
Petitioner: Joseph P. Castegnaro
Respondent: State of Vermont
Case Number: 2:2015cv00270
Filed: December 30, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Vermont
Office: Burlington Office
County: Rutland
Presiding Judge: John M. Conroy
Presiding Judge: Christina Reiss
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 9 OPINION AND ORDER Adopting 8 Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, granting 7 Respondent's MOTION to Dismiss, denying 1 Petitioner's PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Signed by Chief Judge Christina Reiss on 7/18/2016. (pac) Filed date corrected on 7/19/2016 (jlh).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Castegnaro v. State of Vermont
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Joseph P. Castegnaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Vermont
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?