Bapp v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Diane Bapp
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2018cv00001
Filed: January 2, 2018
Court: US District Court for the District of Vermont
Office: Burlington Office
County: Orleans
Presiding Judge: John M. Conroy
Nature of Suit: Disability Insurance
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 19 OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiff's 14 MOTION for Order Reversing the Decision of the Commissioner is GRANTED, in part, and Defendant's 16 MOTION for Order Reversing the Decision of the Commissioner is GRANTED. Signed by Judge John M. Conroy on 10/16/2018. (hbc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bapp v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diane Bapp
Represented By: Francis M. Jackson, Esq.
Represented By: Marc D. Pepin, Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?