Friends of Pine Street v. Everett et al
| Friends of Pine Street |
| Thomas D. Everett, Joe Flynn and Miro Weinburger |
| 5:2019cv00095 |
| June 6, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Vermont |
| Geoffrey W Crawford |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 42:4321 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DOCKET ENTRY CORRECTION re: #3 Waiver of Service Returned Executed filed by Friends of Pine Street. The cover letter included has been removed as cover letters should not be included when filing electronically. The corrected document is now attached to #3 and this entry. (law) |
| Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed: Miro Weinburger waiver sent on 6/10/2019, answer due 8/9/2019.(Hill, Cindy) (Main Document 3 replaced on 7/30/2019) (law). |
| Filing 2 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Thomas D. Everett, Joe Flynn, Miro Weinburger filed by Friends of Pine Street. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A, #2 Certificate of Service) (esb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against Thomas D. Everett, Joe Flynn, Miro Weinburger filed by Friends of Pine Street. (Attachments: #1 Table of Significant Changes, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (pjl) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Vermont District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
