Tiger Fibers, LLC et al v. Aspen Specialty Insurance Company
| Tiger Fibers, LLC and Atlantic Recycling Technologies, LLC |
| Aspen Specialty Insurance Company |
| 1:2007cv01106 |
| November 30, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Alexandria Office |
| Fairfax |
| T. S. Ellis |
| Barry R. Poretz |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
141
ORDER re: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 107 ) and the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant Aspen Specialty Insurance Co. (Doc. No. 106 ). For the reasons stated in the accompanying Me morandum Opinion, it is hereby:ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment as it pertains to Aspen Policy PP000508's provision of building coverage as alleged in Count I and Count II of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint be, an d the same hereby is, GRANTED and this Court hereby declares and finds that the building coverage provided by Aspen Policy PP000508 is valid and enforceable in favor of Plaintiff Atlantic Recycling Technologies, LLC as to the insured property located at 853 Industrial Park Drive, Lawrenceville, Virginia; it is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall jointly advise the Court on or before January 30, 2009, whether either elects to invoke the appraisal process set forth in Aspen Policy PP 000508 with respect to the value of the building coverage claim that is the subject of this Order; it is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs' claim for building coverage under Aspen Policy PP000 508 be, and the same hereby is, DENIED; it isFURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs' request for a declaration under Count II of the Amended Complaint that defendant Aspen Specialty Insuranc e Co. has a current obligation to pay any additional amounts up to replacement cost with respect to Plaintiffs' personal property claim be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED and Plaintiffs' request is hereby DISMISSED; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs' claim for costs and attorneys fees in Count III of the Amended Complaint be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED and Count III is hereby DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Anthony J Trenga on 1/16/09. (kbro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
