Precision Franchising LLC v. Yim et al
| Precision Franchising LLC |
| Pyong Ho Yim and John Kim |
| 1:2009cv00108 |
| February 4, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Contract: Franchise Office |
| Loudoun |
| Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
| T. S. Ellis |
| None |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
JUDGMENT ORDER that the Court adopts as its own the findings of fact and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, as set forth in the August 20, 2009 Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that judgment is ENTERED b y default in favor of plaintiff and against defendants, jointly and severally, in the total amount of $99,213.00. It is further ORDERED that defendants are DIRECTED immediately to cease using and to return to plaintiff all of plaintiff's tr ade secrets, software and other proprietary information provided to defendants in connection with their franchise agreement and operation of the subject franchise. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment pursuant to Rule 58, Fed.R.Civ.P. and to place this matter among the ended causes. (See order for details) Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 9/9/2009. Certified copy sent to counsel for plaintiffs and to the defendants.(stas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
