Boston Retail Products, Inc. v. The Barbour Corporation et al

Defendant: Barbour Plastics, Inc. and The Barbour Corporation
Plaintiff: Boston Retail Products, Inc.
Case Number: 1:2013cv00147
Filed: February 1, 2013
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Alexandria Office
County: Out of State
Referring Judge: Ivan D. Davis
Presiding Judge: T. S. Ellis
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boston Retail Products, Inc. v. The Barbour Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barbour Plastics, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Leo Appler
Represented By: Andrew Clark Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Barbour Corporation
Represented By: Thomas Leo Appler
Represented By: Andrew Clark Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Boston Retail Products, Inc.
Represented By: Jason Allen Cody
Represented By: Thomas P. Pavelko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?