Daniel et al v. Pompeo et al
| Alice Daniel, Inayat Daniel and Shahkar Daniel |
| Mike Pompeo, Paul W. Jones, Carl Risch, John F. Hoover, Christopher Wray and Kirstjen Nielsen |
| 1:2018cv01293 |
| October 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Liam O'Grady |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed. USAO served on 10/22/2018, answer due 12/21/2018. (dvanm, ) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to John F. Hoover, Paul W. Jones, Kirstjen Nielsen, Mike Pompeo, Carl Risch, Christopher Wray, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(aott) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and for a Writ in the Nature of Mandamus against John F. Hoover, Paul W. Jones, Kirstjen Nielsen, Mike Pompeo, Carl Risch, Christopher Wray ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6317002.), filed by Alice Daniel, Inayat Daniel, Shahkar Daniel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(aott) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
