Kim v. Gorman
| Won Yong Kim |
| USBC-Alexandria (United States Bankruptcy Court) |
| Thomas P. Gorman |
| 1:2019cv00237 |
| February 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Claude M Hilton |
| Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1334 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Pro Se E-Noticing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis on 04/24/19. (pmil, )
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing by Won Yong Kim. (pmil, ) |
| Filing 5 Appellant's BRIEF by Won Yong Kim. (Attachments: #1 Attachments)(pmil, ) |
| Remark - Copy of Bankruptcy Scheduling Order of 03/28/19 re-mailed to Won Yong Kim, Appellant - never received 1st copy. (pmil, ) |
| Filing 4 Bankruptcy Scheduling Order: Appellant Brief due by 4/29/2019. (pmil, ) |
| Filing 3 Sealed Document (Restricted Bankruptcy Document). (pmil, ) |
| Filing 2 Bankruptcy Transmittal Cover Sheet together with Designation of Record (Attachments: #1 BK Docket Sheet-Record)(pmil, ) |
| Filing 1 Notice of APPEAL FROM BANKRUPTCY COURT filed by Won Yong Kim with copy of Order being appealed. Bankruptcy Court case number 18-13381-KHK. (Attachments: #1 Bankruptcy Transmittal Sheet, #2 Bankruptcy Order Appealed)(pmil, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
