Kennedy v. Berryhill
| Timothy H. Kennedy |
| Nancy A. Berryhill |
| SSA (Social Security Administration) |
| 1:2019cv00366 |
| March 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Liam O'Grady |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Notice of Correction re #2 Proposed Summons, The filing user has been notified that document #2 is an incorrectly saved PDF fillable form and has been removed. The filing user was directed to refile the document. (klau, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Liam O'Grady and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (klau, ) |
| Filing 2 Document filed in error and removed re Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Timothy H. Kennedy. (Attachments: #1 Document filed in error and removed re Summons, #2 Document filed in error and removed re Summons)(Elkind, Scott) (Main Document 2 replaced on 4/1/2019) (klau, ). (Attachment 1 replaced on 4/1/2019) (klau, ). (Attachment 2 replaced on 4/1/2019) (klau, ). Modified text on 4/1/2019 (klau, ). |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Nancy A. Berryhill ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6567150.), filed by Timothy H. Kennedy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Elkind, Scott) Modified text on 4/1/2019 (klau, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
