Guinn v. Esper et al
Michael J Guinn |
LT GEN Charles N Pede, Dr. Mark T. Esper and Major General David P. Glaser |
1:2019cv00548 |
May 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Ivan D Davis |
Claude M Hilton |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Mark T. Esper, David P. Glaser, Charles N Pede, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two Electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(jlan) |
Filing 6 Proposed Summons Secretary of the Army by Michael J Guinn. (Beliles, Benjamin) |
Filing 5 Proposed Summons Maj Gen Glaser by Michael J Guinn. (Beliles, Benjamin) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons Lt Gen Pede by Michael J Guinn. (Beliles, Benjamin) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons by Michael J Guinn. (Beliles, Benjamin) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons for United States Attorney General by Michael J Guinn. (Beliles, Benjamin) |
Electronic Fee Payment - by Michael J Guinn. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6627920.. (Beliles, Benjamin) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Claude M. Hilton and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (jlan) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $ 400.), filed by Michael J Guinn. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Guinn Civil Cover Sheet)(Beliles, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.