Thomas v. Wells Fargo, N.A. et al
Lamont Thomas |
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Wells Fargo, N.A. and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
1:2019cv01273 |
October 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
John F Anderson |
T S Ellis |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDERED that this action be and is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim; and it is further ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(g),3 this dismissal may affect plaintiffs ability to proceed in forma pauperis in future civil actions; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis #2 be and is DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to subpoena #3 be and is DENIED as moot; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk record this dismissal for purposes of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 10/29/2019. (dvanm, ) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Subpoena Pursuant to Rule 45(a) of Local Fed. R. of Civ. P. by Lamont Thomas. (dvanm, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lamont Thomas. (dvanm, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Wells Fargo, N.A., filed by Lamont Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Data Sheet, #2 Declaration, #3 Envelope)(dvanm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.