Crawley v. Hicks, et. al.
| Sherral M. Crawley |
| Dr. Martin, Nurse Hicks and Warden Aldrige |
| 1:2019cv01321 |
| October 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Rossie D Alston |
| Ivan D Davis |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 12/6/2019. (dvanm, c/m 12/6/2019)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDERED that Crawley either (1) PAY $400 OR (2) SUBMIT a complete application for permission to proceed in forma pauperis WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS of the entry date of this Order; and it is further ORDERED that Crawley FILE an amended complaint that (A) lists each prior civil action and appeal that she has filed in federal court while incarcerated and (B) contains a comprehensible statement of claim WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS of the entry date of this Order. Signed by District Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr on 10/21/2019. (dvanm, c/m 10/22/2019)
|
| Filing 2 Acknowledgment of Receipt letter sent to Sherral M. Crawley. (acha, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Warden Aldrige, Nurse Hicks, Dr. Martin (Filing fee $ 400., not paid), filed by Sherral M. Crawley. (Attachments: #1 Prisoner Data Report, #2 Envelope)(acha, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
