Precision Franchising LLC, v. Melanie Auto Care, Inc. et al
Precision Franchising LLC, |
Frank Hernandez, Melanie Auto Care, Inc. and Eloisa Hernandez |
1:2019cv01341 |
October 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Ivan D Davis |
Anthony J Trenga |
Contract: Franchise |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Precision Franchising LLC, (Sallis, Justin) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Eloisa Hernandez, Frank Hernandez, Melanie Auto Care, Inc. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(dvanm, ) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Anthony J Trenga and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (dvanm, ) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons for Melanie Auto Care, Inc., Frank Hernandez, and Eloisa Hernandez by Precision Franchising LLC,. (Sallis, Justin) |
Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Precision Franchising LLC,. (Sallis, Justin) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6900742.), filed by Precision Franchising LLC,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Franchise Agreement, #2 Exhibit B - Guaranty Agreement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sallis, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.