Aparcio Sorto et al v. Cubasi Bistro Corp et al
| Jennifer C Aparcio Sorto and Carlos D Portillo Lizama |
| Jennice Rodriguez, Sigfrido Rodriguez and Cubasi Bistro Corp |
| 1:2020cv00246 |
| March 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| T S Ellis |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued for service by SPS as to Cubasi Bistro Corp, Jennice Rodriguez, Sigfrido Rodriguez. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(klau, ) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge T. S. Ellis, III and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (klau, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Jennifer C Aparcio Sorto, Carlos D Portillo Lizama. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Proposed Summons)(Sutter, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with Jury Demand against Cubasi Bistro Corp., Sigfrido Rodriguez, Jennice Rodriguez ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-7105203.), filed by Jennifer C Aparcio Sorto, Carlos D Portillo Lizama. (Attachments: #1 Civil Case Cover Sheet)(Sutter, Matthew) Modified text on 3/5/2020 (klau, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
