Lane v. Charter Communications, Inc.
| Michelle S Lane |
| Charter Communications, Inc. and Time Warner Cable, Inc. |
| 1:2020cv01361 |
| November 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John F Anderson |
| T S Ellis |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Upon consideration of the representations made by the parties in their Rule 26(f) Joint Proposed Discovery Plan ("Joint Discovery Plan") (Docket no. 12), and taking note of the Scheduling Order entered in this case (Docket no. 11), the court makes the following rulings: The Joint Discovery Plan filed by the parties is approved and shall control discovery to the extent of its application unless further modified by the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 12/23/2020. SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. (wgar, )
|
| Filing 12 Rule 26(f) Joint Proposed Discovery Plan by Charter Communications, Inc..(Finley, Tillman) |
|
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER:Initial Pretrial Conference set for 1/20/2021 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 501 before Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson.Discovery due by 4/9/2021.Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/27/2021 at 04:00 PM in Alexandria Courtroom 900 before District Judge T. S. Ellis III (If the parties do not file dispositive motions).Final Pretrial Conference set for 7/15/2021 at 04:00 PM in Alexandria Courtroom 900 before District Judge T. S. Ellis III (If the parties do file dispositive motions). Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 12/09/2020. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form, #2 Pretrial Notice)(tran)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Pro hac vice as to Rachel Mary Bishop. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 12/9/2020. (dvanm, )
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Pro hac vice as to Gary E. Thomas. Signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson on 12/9/2020. (dvanm, )
|
| Filing 8 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Rachel Mary Bishop and Certification of Local Counsel Tillman J. Finley Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-7533649. by Charter Communications, Inc.. (Finley, Tillman) |
| Filing 7 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Gary E. Thomas and Certification of Local Counsel Tillman J. Finley Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-7533643. by Charter Communications, Inc.. (Finley, Tillman) |
| Filing 6 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Charter Communications, Inc.. (Finley, Tillman) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Charter Communications, Inc..(Finley, Tillman) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michelle S Lane Charter Communications, Inc. served on 11/17/2020, answer due 12/8/2020 (Brown, Carla) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Charter Communications, Inc.. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(dvanm, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Michelle S Lane. (Brown, Carla) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-7492454.), filed by Michelle S Lane. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brown, Carla) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge T. S. Ellis, III and Magistrate Judge John F. Anderson. (dvanm, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
