Rivas-Flores v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
| Rosa Rivas-Flores |
| Costco Wholesale Corporation |
| 1:2021cv00753 |
| June 23, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Ivan D Davis |
| T S Ellis |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order. Because the parties' Proposed Joint Discovery Plan #5 adequately addresses the matters that would be discussed during the initial pretrial conference and counsel consent to waiving their appearances at the initial pretrial conference, the initial pretrial conference scheduled for July 28, 2021, pursuant to Rule 16(b) and this Court's June 25, 2021, Order, is cancelled. Upon consideration of the representations made by the parties in their Proposed Joint Discovery Plan, the Court makes the following rulings: The parties' Joint Discovery Plan is approved and shall control discovery to the extent of its application unless further modified by the Court. See order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis on 7/22/2021. (lgue, )
|
| Filing 5 Proposed Joint Discovery Plan by Costco Wholesale Corporation.(Haynes, James) |
|
Filing 4
SCHEDULING ORDER:Initial Pretrial Conference set for 7/28/2021 at 11:00 AM in Alexandria Courtroom 301 before Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis.Discovery due by 10/29/2021.Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/6/2022 at 04:00 PM in Alexandria Courtroom 900 before District Judge T. S. Ellis III (If the parties do not file dispositive motions).Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/17/2022 at 04:00 PM in Alexandria Courtroom 900 before District Judge T. S. Ellis III (If the parties do file dispositive motions). Signed by District Judge T. S. Ellis, III on 06/25/2021. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form, #2 Pretrial Notice)(tran)
|
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge T. S. Ellis, III and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (lber) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Haynes, James) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Costco Wholesale Corporation.(Haynes, James) |
| Filing 1 Notice of Removal ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-7856313.), filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint)(Haynes, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rivas-Flores v. Costco Wholesale Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation | |
| Represented By: | James Matthew Haynes, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rosa Rivas-Flores | |
| Represented By: | John Robert Kelly |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
