Boundy v. United States Patent and Trademark Office(USPTO)
| DAVID BOUNDY |
| UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO) |
| 1:2021cv01366 |
| December 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Theresa Carroll Buchanan |
| Patricia Tolliver Giles |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. § 552 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #17 Joint MOTION to Stay the Proceedings; and it is further ORDERED that the instant action is STAYED until further order of this Court; and it is hereby ORDERED that the parties shall file status reports with this Court every sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles on 1/26/2022. (nneb)
|
|
Filing 17
Joint MOTION to Stay the Proceedings by United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wesnousky, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 16
Certificate Reporting Service by United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). (Wesnousky, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 15
NOTICE of Appearance by Carolyn Michaela Wesnousky on behalf of United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) (Wesnousky, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 14
Certificate Reporting Service by United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) served on 1/4/2022, answer due 3/11/2022. (Wesnousky, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE of Appearance by Carolyn Michaela Wesnousky on behalf of United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) (Wesnousky, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 12
SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Boundy. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) served on 1/10/2022, answer due 3/11/2022. (Neifeld, Richard)
|
|
Filing 11
Filed in Error and Removed (nneb, ).
|
|
Filing 10
Filed in Error and Removed (nneb, ).
|
|
Filing 9
Filed In Error and Removed (nneb, ).
|
|
Filing 8
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Office of the General Counsel, United States Patent and Trademark Office on 1/4/2022, filed by David Boundy. (Neifeld, Richard) Modified on 1/13/2022 to correct docket event (nneb, ).
|
|
Filing 7
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia served on 1/4/2022, answer due 3/11/2022. filed by David Boundy. (Neifeld, Richard) Modified on 1/13/2022 to correct docket event (dest). Modified on 1/13/2022 (nneb).
|
|
Filing 6
AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint served on Attorney General of the United States served on 1/4/2022, filed by David Boundy. (Neifeld, Richard) Modified on 1/13/2022 (dest). Modified on 1/13/2022 to correct docket event (nneb, ).
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued as to UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO), U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney)(nneb)
|
|
Filing 4
Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, by DAVID BOUNDY. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Proposed Summons, US Atty, #2 Appendix Proposed Summons, Atty General)(Neifeld, Richard)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE by DAVID BOUNDY re #1 Complaint, Civil Cover Sheet (Neifeld, Richard)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Neifeld on behalf of DAVID BOUNDY (Neifeld, Richard)
|
|
Notice of Correction re #1 Complaint. The filing user has been notified that document [1-1 and 1-2] are incorrectly saved PDF fillable forms and have been removed. The filing user was directed to refile the documents. (nneb)
|
|
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles and Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan. (nneb)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8140817.), filed by DAVID BOUNDY. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Letter Appearance (Form ao458), #3 Affidavit Certificate of Service)(Neifeld, Richard) (Attachment 1 replaced on 12/8/2021 Removed incorrectly filed PDF fillable form) (nneb, ). (Attachment 2 replaced on 12/8/2021 Removed incorrectly filed PDF fillable form) (nneb, ). Modified on 12/8/2021 (nneb, ).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Boundy v. United States Patent and Trademark Office(USPTO) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DAVID BOUNDY | |
| Represented By: | Richard Neifeld |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO) | |
| Represented By: | Carolyn Michaela Wesnousky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
