Hyatt v. Vidal
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant: Katherine K. Vidal
Case Number: 1:2023cv00082
Filed: January 17, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Ivan D Davis
Referring Judge: Michael S Nachmanoff
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Joint MOTION to Stay Pending Resolution of Related Case (see Order for details). Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 6/1/2023. (nneb)
May 31, 2023 Filing 10 Joint MOTION to Stay Pending Resolution of Related Case by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(DeLaquil, Mark)
May 30, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Hugham Chan on behalf of Katherine K. Vidal (Chan, Hugham)
May 30, 2023 Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Gilbert P. Hyatt by Katherine K. Vidal.(Chan, Hugham)
April 17, 2023 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gilbert P. Hyatt. Katherine K. Vidal served on 4/13/2023, answer due 6/12/2023. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service (U.S. Attorney General), #2 Affidavit of Service (U.S. Attorney for the EDVA))(DeLaquil, Mark)
January 19, 2023 Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Katherine K. Vidal, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Summons Returned Unexecuted as to USA. (Attachments: #1 Notice to Attorney)(Dest, )
January 17, 2023 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff and Magistrate Judge Ivan D. Davis. (Dest)
January 17, 2023 Filing 5 Report on the filing or determination of an action by Gilbert P. Hyatt (DeLaquil, Mark). Modified to correct filing event on 1/19/2023 (Dest).
January 17, 2023 Filing 4 Proposed Summons to the U.S. Attorney for the EDVA by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (DeLaquil, Mark)
January 17, 2023 Filing 3 Proposed Summons to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (DeLaquil, Mark)
January 17, 2023 Filing 2 Proposed Summons to the Attorney General of the United States by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (DeLaquil, Mark)
January 17, 2023 Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8757032.), filed by Gilbert P. Hyatt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DeLaquil, Mark)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hyatt v. Vidal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Represented By: Mark Wendell DeLaquil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: Katherine K. Vidal
Represented By: Hugham Chan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?