Lodhi v. Dameron et al
| Saad Usman Lodhi |
| Tremayne Dameron, Kimberly Hobson, A. David Robinson and Harold W Clarke |
| 1:2023cv00792 |
| June 20, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John F Anderson |
| Leonie M Brinkema |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim - Personal Injury/Motor Vehicle |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDERED that the plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs [Dkt. No. 2] is DENIED as moot, and it is hereby ORDERED that this Complaint [Dkt. No. 1] be and is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE to make it clear to the plaintiff that he may not continue to file FTCA claims against state officials (see Order for further details). Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 6/27/2023. (Dest)
|
| Filing 4 Proposed Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action filed by Saad Usman Lodhi. (Attachments: #1 Letter) (Dest) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons filed by Saad Usman Lodhi. (Dest) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Saad Usman Lodhi. (Dest) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Harold W Clarke, Tremayne Dameron, Kimberly Hobson, A. David Robinson, filed by Saad Usman Lodhi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Dest) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
