TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED v. PPGAMESUSA.COM et al
| TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED |
| PPGAMESUSA.COM, PRAGMATICPLAYGAMING.COM, ASIAPRAGMATICPLAY.COM, PPPGAMES.NET, PRAGMATICPLAYBONANZA.COM, PRAGMATICPLAYKR.COM, PRAGMATICPLAYYSLOT.COM, PRAGMATICPLAYZEUS.COM, SG60-PPGAMES.NET, STATIC-PPGAMES.NET, KRST1-SG0-PPGAMES.NET, PP-GAMES.NET, PRAGMATICPLAY-EN.NET, GSOFT65-PPGAMES.NET, GSTW0-PPGAMES.NET, KGAME-PPGAME.NET, CN0-PPGAMES.NET, JP1-PPGAMES.NET, PRAGMATICPLAY-KOR.COM, PRAGMATICPLAY-GOLDLINK.COM, PRAGMATICPLAY-GSPLAY.COM, DK10-PRAGMATICPLAY.NET, PRAGMATICPLAYHACKS.COM, PPGAMESLOT345.COM, PRAGMATICPLAY-TH.NET, SGX-PPGAMES.NET, XXX-PPGAMES.NET and SG7-PPGAMES.NET |
| 1:2023cv01692 |
| December 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| William E Fitzpatrick |
| Claude M Hilton |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to defendants ASIAPRAGMATICPLAY.COM, CN0-PPGAMES.NET, DK10-PRAGMATICPLAY.NET, GSOFT65-PPGAMES.NET, GSTW0-PPGAMES.NET, JP1-PPGAMES.NET, KGAME-PPGAME.NET, KRST1-SG0-PPGAMES.NET, PP-GAMES.NET, PPGAMESLOT345.COM, PPGAMESUSA.COM, PPPGAMES.NET, PRAGMATICPLAY-EN.NET, PRAGMATICPLAY-GOLDLINK.COM, PRAGMATICPLAY-GSPLAY.COM, PRAGMATICPLAY-KOR.COM, PRAGMATICPLAY-TH.NET, PRAGMATICPLAYBONANZA.COM, PRAGMATICPLAYGAMING.COM, PRAGMATICPLAYHACKS.COM, PRAGMATICPLAYKR.COM, PRAGMATICPLAYYSLOT.COM, PRAGMATICPLAYZEUS.COM, SG60-PPGAMES.NET, SG7-PPGAMES.NET, SGX-PPGAMES.NET, STATIC-PPGAMES.NET, XXX-PPGAMES.NET (Dest) (Main Document 11 replaced to correct defendant PPPGAMES.NET spelling on 2/7/2024) (Dest). |
| Filing 10 Request for Entry of Default as to all Defendants by Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of S. Brooks)(Barnes, Attison) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Pro hac vice Appointed David Edison Weslow for Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited. Signed by District Judge Claude M. Hilton on 1/11/2024. (swil)
|
| Filing 8 Declaration re #6 Order on Motion for Service by Publication by Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited. (Attachments: #1 Letter re Compliance)(Barnes, Attison) |
| Filing 7 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by David E. Weslow and Certification of Local Counsel Attison L. Barnes Filing fee $ 75, receipt number AVAEDC-9298772. by Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited. (Barnes, Attison) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #3 MOTION for Service by Publication (see Order for further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick on 12/28/2023. (Dest)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Waiver of Hearing re #3 MOTION for Service by Publication by Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited (Barnes, Attison) |
| Filing 4 Memorandum in Support re #3 MOTION for Service by Publication filed by Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Attachment 1)(Barnes, Attison) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Service by Publication by Tamaris (Gibraltar) Limited. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Barnes, Attison) |
| No service issued at this time. (Dest) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Claude M. Hilton and Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick. (Dest) |
| Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED. (Barnes, Attison) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9261137.), filed by TAMARIS (GIBRALTAR) LIMITED. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-30, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Barnes, Attison) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
