Rayburn v. Bechtel Corporation
Plaintiff: Henry Rayburn
Defendant: Bechtel Corporation
Case Number: 1:2025cv00265
Filed: February 12, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 704 Labor Litigation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 12, 2025 Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Henry Rayburn. (Joseph Goodson, Tiffany)
February 12, 2025 Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-10005525.), filed by Henry Rayburn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Joseph Goodson, Tiffany)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rayburn v. Bechtel Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henry Rayburn
Represented By: Tiffany Joseph Goodson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bechtel Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?