China Telecom (Americas) Corporation et al v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
| China Telecom (Americas) Corporation and Hui Zhao |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Connie Nolan and Kika Scott |
| 1:2025cv00356 |
| February 24, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Michael S Nachmanoff |
| William B Porter |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
So Ordered re #10 Stipulation of Dismissal filed by United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Connie Nolan, Kika Scott. Signed by District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff on 4/11/2025. (lcre, )
|
| Filing 10 STIPULATION of Dismissal (Joint) by Connie Nolan, Kika Scott, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Loftus, Meghan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Meghan Elizabeth Loftus on behalf of Connie Nolan, Kika Scott, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Loftus, Meghan) |
| Filed in error and removed (swil). |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by China Telecom (Americas) Corporation, Hui Zhao. Connie Nolan served on 2/28/2025, answer due 4/29/2025; Kika Scott served on 2/28/2025, answer due 4/29/2025; United States Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 2/28/2025, answer due 4/29/2025. (Attachments: #1 Returned Summons - Nolan, #2 Returned Summons - Scott, #3 Returned Summons - US Attorney General, #4 Returned Summons - US Attorney for the EDVA)(Broderdorf, David) Modified to correct served/answer due date on 3/11/2025 (swil). |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Connie Nolan, Kika Scott, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed as to USA or Summons Returned Unexecuted as to USA. (Attachments: #1 Summons Notice)(swil) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Michael S Nachmanoff and US Magistrate Judge William B. Porter. (swil) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia by China Telecom (Americas) Corporation, Hui Zhao (Broderdorf, David) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons U.S. Attorney General by China Telecom (Americas) Corporation, Hui Zhao (Broderdorf, David) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons Kika Scott by China Telecom (Americas) Corporation, Hui Zhao (Broderdorf, David) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons Connie Nolan by China Telecom (Americas) Corporation, Hui Zhao (Broderdorf, David) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons United States Citizenship and Immigration Services by China Telecom (Americas) Corporation, Hui Zhao (Broderdorf, David) |
| Filing 1 Complaint for Injunctive Relief and Petition for Writ of Mandamus ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-10023822.), filed by China Telecom (Americas) Corporation, Hui Zhao. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Broderdorf, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
