Canslor v. Clarke

Canslor v. Clarke

Petitioner:	Jarvis L. Canslor
Respondent:	Harold W. Clarke
Case Number:	2:2013cv00116
Filed:	March 4, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office:	Norfolk Office
County:	Virginia Beach City
Presiding Judge:	Mark S. Davis
Presiding Judge:	Lawrence R. Leonard
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 29, 2016	Filing 59 MEMORANDUM ORDER. The Court ADOPTS 56 Report and Recommendations and OVERRULES Petitioner's Objections in full. As such, the Court DENIED and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE 52 Motion for Relief from Judgment, and DENIES AS MOOT 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. Further, the Court DENIES 57 Motion for Recusal under both 28 U.S.C. § 144 and 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) and (b)(1). Finding that Petitioner has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,&q uot; a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Petitioner is ADVISED that if he intends to appeal the denial of his Motion for Recusal, or pursuant an appeal of his Motion for Relief from Judgment by seeking a certificate of appealability from the Un ited States Court of Appeal for the Fourth Circuit, he must forward a written notice of appeal to the Clerk of the United States District Court, United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia, 23510 within thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to forward a copy of this Memorandum Order to pro se Petitioner and all counsel of record. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 6/29/2016. Copies mailed 6/30/2016. (jmey, )
August 25, 2014	Filing 41 FINAL ORDER. The Court does hereby ADOPT and APPROVE 36 Report and Recommendations. The Petitioner's 39 Objections are OVERRULED in full. Therefore, the Respondent's 22 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Petitioner's 31 Motion to Affirm, 32 Motion for Default, 33 Motion for Summary Judgment and 40 Request for Evidentiary Hearing and Counsel are DENIED. It is further ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of the Respondent. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 8/25/2014. Copies mailed 8/25/2014. (jmey, )

Date Filed

Document Text

June 29, 2016

Filing 59 MEMORANDUM ORDER. The Court ADOPTS 56 Report and Recommendations and OVERRULES Petitioner's Objections in full. As such, the Court DENIED and DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE 52 Motion for Relief from Judgment, and DENIES AS MOOT 55 Motion for Summary Judgment. Further, the Court DENIES 57 Motion for Recusal under both 28 U.S.C. § 144 and 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) and (b)(1). Finding that Petitioner has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,&q uot; a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Petitioner is ADVISED that if he intends to appeal the denial of his Motion for Recusal, or pursuant an appeal of his Motion for Relief from Judgment by seeking a certificate of appealability from the Un ited States Court of Appeal for the Fourth Circuit, he must forward a written notice of appeal to the Clerk of the United States District Court, United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia, 23510 within thirty (30) days from the date of this Memorandum Order. The Clerk is DIRECTED to forward a copy of this Memorandum Order to pro se Petitioner and all counsel of record. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 6/29/2016. Copies mailed 6/30/2016. (jmey, )

August 25, 2014

Filing 41 FINAL ORDER. The Court does hereby ADOPT and APPROVE 36 Report and Recommendations. The Petitioner's 39 Objections are OVERRULED in full. Therefore, the Respondent's 22 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and the 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Petitioner's 31 Motion to Affirm, 32 Motion for Default, 33 Motion for Summary Judgment and 40 Request for Evidentiary Hearing and Counsel are DENIED. It is further ORDERED that judgment be entered in favor of the Respondent. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 8/25/2014. Copies mailed 8/25/2014. (jmey, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Canslor v. Clarke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Jarvis L. Canslor
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?