Certusview Technologies, LLC v. S & N Locating Services, LLC et al
| Certusview Technologies, LLC |
| S & N Locating Services, LLC and S & N Communications, Inc. |
| 2:2013cv00346 |
| May 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Out of State |
| Mark S. Davis |
| Lawrence R. Leonard |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
579
OPINION AND ORDER. The Court DENIES 573 Motion for Attorney Fees and Exceptional Case Finding. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 2/9/18. (bpet)
|
|
Filing
545
OPINION AND ORDER Denying 533 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Reconsideration of the Court's Judgment of Patent Ineligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101, ECF No. 533, is DENIED. As no pertinent issues remain f or resolution on Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, ECF No. 55, and as the Court has previously entered judgment on Defendants' declaratory judgment counterclaim for inequitable conduct, see ECF No. 542, the Clerk is REQUESTED to enter final judgment in Defendants' favor on Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 8/10/16. Copies distributed to all parties 8/10/16. (ldab, )
|
|
Filing
364
Opinion & ORDER Granting in Part re: 232 Motion Request for Monetary Sanctions. Defendant S&Ns Request for Monetary Sanctions, ECF No. 232, is GRANTED IN PART, and S&N is awarded $57,722 in attorneys fees and $3,200.61 in costs, less $18,458.55 for CertusViews previous award, for a total award amount of $42,464.06. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller and filed on 9/1/15. Copies distributed to all counsel of record 9/1/15. (ldab, )
|
|
Filing
352
ORDER Denying 341 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth above, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 341. In light of such ruling, the Court CANCELS the hearing originally set for August 14, 2015 because oral argument would not aid in the decisional process. The Court DIRECTS counsel for the parties to contact the docket clerk within seven (7) days after the entry of this Memorandum Order to set the date for the bench trial in this matter.. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 8/7/15. Copies distributed to all parties 8/7/15. (ldab, )
|
|
Filing
329
ORDER Denying 257 Motion for Attorney Fees. The Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Defendants' Motion for Exceptional Case Finding & Attorneys' Fees, ECF No. 257. Defendants may re-file such motion within fourteen (14) days after the latte r of the Federal Circuit's ruling on the merits of Plaintiff's pending appeals (Nos. 15-1404, 15-1571) or the Court's entry of judgment with respect to Defendants' inequitable conduct counterclaims. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 6/1/15. Copies distributed to all parties 6/1/15. (ldab, )
|
|
Filing
325
OPINION AND ORDER 256 Motion Re: Objections to Magistrate Judge's Ruling or Recommendation; granting in part and denying in part 260 Motion to Strike. The Court OVERRULES Plaintiff's objections, ECF No. 256, to the magistrat e judge's January 16, 2015 Order. The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART CertusView's Motion to Strike and in the Alternative Dismiss S&N's First Amended Answer and Counterclaims, ECF No. 260. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to re-open this matter to allow Defendants to proceed with their inequitable conduct counterclaims. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 5/22/15. Copies distributed to all parties 5/22/15. (ldab, )
|
|
Filing
250
OPINION AND ORDER - GRANTS S&N's Motion for Judgment on the pleadings based on Failure to Claim Patent-Eligible Subject Matter, ECF No. 197. In light of such decision, the Court FINDS AS MOOT plaintiff's 213 Motion for Summary Judgment; and defendants' 216 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Clerk is REQUESTED to entr judgment in Defendants' favor pursuant to Rule 58 of the FR of Civil Procedure. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 1/21/15. (afar, )
|
|
Filing
159
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 140 Motion to Limit Number of Asserted Patent Claims. For the reasons set forth above, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants' renewed motion to limit the number of asserted paten t claims and GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Plaintiff's cross-motion to limit the number of invalidity arguments. Certusview is DIRECTED to file an Election of Asserted Claims containing no more than FIFTEEN (15) claims within seven (7) days of the filing of this Opinion and Order. S&N is DIRECTED to make an Election of Asserted Prior Art containing no more than TWENTY FIVE (25) prior art references within seven (7) days after Certusview files its Election of Asserted Claims. As stated a bove, this Opinion and Order is without prejudice to either Certusview or S&N requesting, by an appropriate motion, to assert additional claims or additional prior art references upon a showing of good cause. The Court GRANTS S&N's unopposed request for leave to serve an amended opening invalidity expert report. If Defendants choose to file an amended opening invalidity expert report, they must do so within twenty one (21) days after Certusview files its Election of Asserted Claims. The Court DENIES S&N's motion for sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 9/30/14. Copies distributed to all counsel of record 10/1/14. (ldab, )
|
|
Filing
57
OPINION and ORDER the Court DENIES Defendants'motion to transfer venue. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis and filed on 12/12/2013. (rsim, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
