JTH Tax, Inc. v. Geraci et al
JTH Tax, Inc. |
Jonlary Circle Enterprises, LLC and Alan Geraci |
2:2014cv00236 |
May 20, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Norfolk Office |
Virginia Beach City |
Douglas E. Miller |
Raymond A. Jackson |
Franchise |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ORDER Granting 7 Motion for Default Judgment. Plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment against Defendants Geraci and JCE, is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that judgment be entered on behalf of Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of$267,286 .83. Plaintiffs request for costs and attorney's fees is DEFERRED. Further, the Court enters permanent injunctive relief as follows: Defendants, their agents, servants, employees, attorneys, consultants, affiliates, successors, and/or assigns and/or any other individual or entity within their control or supervision and/or all other persons or entities acting in concert with Defendants or on their behalf are hereby ORDERED within THIRTY (30) DAYS of entry of this order to (see order for details). IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 10/2/14. Memorandum Opinion and Order sent to the parties. Defendants both at Geraci's previous address of record and to the address used on Defendants' most recent filing with the Court, ECF No. 11 on 10/2/14. (ldab, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.