JTH Tax, Inc. et al v. Aime et al
| JTH Tax, Inc. and SiempreTax LLC |
| Gregory Aime, Wolf Ventures, Inc., Aime Consulting, LLC and Aime Consulting, Inc. |
| 2:2016cv00279 |
| June 9, 2016 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Virginia Beach City |
| Lawrence R. Leonard |
| Henry C. Morgan |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
OPINION & ORDER entered and filed 2/15/17: This matter is before the Court following a bench trial held January 11, 2017 through January 13, 2017 between Plaintiffs JTH Tax, Inc. d/b/a Liberty Tax Service and SiempreTax+, LLC ("Plaintiff& #039;") and Defendants Gregory Aime, Wolf Ventures, Inc. d/b/a Wolf Enterprises, Aime Consulting, LLC and Aime Consulting, Inc. ("Defendants"). After the trial, the Court SET ASIDE the Temporary Restraining Order, DENIED Plaintiff& #039;s Claims, and GRANTED IN PART Defendants' Counterclaims. The Court entered Judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs JTH Tax, Inc. d/b/a Liberty Tax Service and SiempreTax+, LLC, jointly and severally, in the amount of $2 ,736,896.17 on January 13, 2017. The Court ORDERS that interest shall accrue at the judgment rate from that date of the Judgment of January 13, 2017. (See Opinion and Order and Foot Notes for Specifics) (Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr. on 2/14/17). Copies provided as directed 2/15/17. (ecav, )
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION AND ORDER entered 7/29/16 and filed 8/3/16: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff JTH Tax, Inc. d/b/a Liberty Tax Service andSiempreTax LLC's ("Plaintiff") Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue ("the Motion") Doc. 7 . JTH Tax. Inc. d/b/a Liberty Tax Service and SiempreTax LLC are both Plaintiffs, but for clarity only, the Court refers to them collectively as "Plaintiff." "Should N ot Issue" is an error; Plaintiff does request a preliminary injunction. Doc. 7 at 2. Plaintiff's accompanying brief is entitled "Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue." Doc. 8. In a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), the Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDED that the Motion be GRANTED IN PART. Doc. 16 , as outlined. Defenda nts Gregory Aime, Aime Consulting, LLC, Wolf Ventures, Inc., and Aime Consulting, Inc. ("Defendants") object to the R&R. Doc. 18 . For the reasons outlined in this Opinion and Order, the Court OVERRULES Defendants' obje ctions and ADOPTS, in its entirety, the Magistrate Judge's R&R. Doc. 16. The Court GRANTS IN PART Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue. Doc. 7. The facts and history set fort h herein are derived from evidence tendered in the TRO hearing as well as pleadings and motions filed with this Court. These are preliminary factual findings based on the existing record which shall be used for the limited purpose of ruling on the Magistrate Judge's R&R. (See Opinion And Order and all Foot Notes for Specifics) (Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr. on 7/29/16). Copies provided as directed on 8/4/16. (ecav, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
