(EPP)Turlock Irrigation District, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Turlock Irrigation District, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Defendant: Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., MSP Singapore Co. LLC, Merck & Co., Inc., Glenmark Generics Inc., U.S.A., Schering-Plough Corp. and Schering Corp.
Case Number: 2:2018cv00352
Filed: June 29, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Norfolk Office
County: Out of State
Presiding Judge: Mark S Davis
Referring Judge: Robert J Krask
2 Judge: Douglas E Miller
3 Judge: Rebecca Beach Smith
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 15:1
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 29, 2018 Filing 5 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Kenneth Matthew Holmboe and Certification of Local Counsel Ashley Marie Bond Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6157245. by Turlock Irrigation District, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated. (Bond, Ashley)
June 29, 2018 Filing 4 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by John Peter Coyle and Certification of Local Counsel Ashley Marie Bond Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6157241. by Turlock Irrigation District, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated. (Bond, Ashley)
June 29, 2018 Filing 3 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Jon Robert Stickman and Certification of Local Counsel Ashley Marie Bond Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6157233. by Turlock Irrigation District, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated. (Bond, Ashley)
June 29, 2018 Filing 2 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Jason Scott Hartley and Certification of Local Counsel Ashley Marie Bond Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6157229. by Turlock Irrigation District, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated. (Bond, Ashley)
June 29, 2018 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Glenmark Generics Inc., U.S.A., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC, Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Schering Corp., Schering-Plough Corp. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6156909.), filed by Turlock Irrigation District, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated.(epri)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: (EPP)Turlock Irrigation District, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Par Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MSP Singapore Co. LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merck & Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Glenmark Generics Inc., U.S.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schering-Plough Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Schering Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Turlock Irrigation District, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Represented By: Ashley Marie Bond
Represented By: John Peter Coyle
Represented By: Jon Robert Stickman
Represented By: Jason Scott Hartley
Represented By: Kenneth Matthew Holmboe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?