(DPP)Rite Aid Corporation v. Merck & Co., Inc.
| Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and Rite Aid Corporation |
| Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC, Merck & Co., Inc., Glenmark Generics Inc., U.S.A., Schering-Plough Corp. and Schering Corp. |
| 2:2018cv00423 |
| August 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Out of State |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 3, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
Agreed ORDER in case granting 143 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to Pretrial Order No. 4 2:18-md-02836-RBS-DEM. (See order for details). Copies distributed to all counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on 10/3/2018. Associated Cases: 2:18-md-02836-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00266-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00423- RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00439-RBS-DEM (clou)
|
| Filing 15 Jointly Proposed Pretrial Order No. 5. Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 10/2/2018. Associated Cases: 2:18-md-02836-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00023-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00039-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00071-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00108-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00116-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00130-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00213-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00232-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00266-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00352-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00403-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00423-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00439-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-01000-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-01001-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-01002-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-01003-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-01004-RBS-DEM(clou ) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Douglas E. Miller. #10 MOTION to Compel (clou ) |
| Filing 14 REPLY to Response #12 re #10 MOTION to Compel Against Merck Defendants filed by Albertsons Companies, Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., HEB Grocery Company L.P., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., The Kroger Co., Walgreen Co.. (Reilly, Craig) (Entered: 08/31/2018 in 2:18md2836)(clou ) |
| Filing 13 Declaration re #12 Response to Motion of Christopher D. Dusseault by MSP Singapore Co. LLC, Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Schering Corp., Schering-Plough Corp.. (Noona, Stephen) (Entered: 08/30/2018 in 2:18md2836) (clou ) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE to Motion re #10 MOTION to Compel Against Merck Defendants filed by MSP Singapore Co. LLC, Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Schering Corp., Schering-Plough Corp.. (Noona, Stephen) (Entered: 08/30/2018 in 2:18md2836)(clou ) |
| Filing 11 Memorandum in Support re #10 MOTION to Compel Against Merck Defendants filed by Albertsons Companies, Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., HEB Grocery Company L.P., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., The Kroger Co., Walgreen Co.. (Reilly, Craig) (Entered: 08/16/2018 in 2:18md2836) (clou ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Compel Against Merck Defendants by Albertsons Companies, Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc., HEB Grocery Company L.P., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., The Kroger Co., Walgreen Co.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Reilly, Craig) (Entered: 08/16/2018 in 2:18md2836)(clou ) |
| Filing 9 Pretrial Order No. 4 - The court hereby ORDERS that the DPP file a consolidated complaint no later than September 13, 2018; the EPP file a consolidated amended complaint no later than September 13, 2018; and the Retailer Plaintiffs file an amended complaint, if desired, no later than September 13, 2018. (See order for specific details). Copies distributed to all counsel of record in all member cases as directed. Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 8/15/18. Associated Cases: 2:18-md-02836-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00023-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00035-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00039-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00071-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00108-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00116-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00130-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00213-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00232-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00266-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00352-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00403-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00423-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00439-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-01000-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-01001-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-01002-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-01003-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-01004-RBS-DEM(clou ) |
| Filing 8 Pretrial Order No. 3 - GRANTING the following motions: Merck Defendants (ECF No. 42); Glenmark Defendants (ECF No. 40); Walgreens Plaintiffs (ECF No. 22); DPPs (ECF No. 16); the City of Providence, Rhode Island and Painters District Council No. 30 Health & Welfare Funds (ECF Nos. 50); the Uniformed Firefighters Association of Greater New York Security Benefit Fund and the Retired Firefighters Security Benefit Fund of the Uniformed Firefighters Association (ECF No. 51). DENYING the following motions: "Majority EPPs" (ECF No. 58); Self Insured Schools of California (ECF No. 52); UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund (ECF No. 41). (See order for specific details). Copies distributed to all counsel of record in all member cases as directed. Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 8/14/18. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)Associated Cases: 2:18-md-02836-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00023-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00035-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00039-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00071-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00108-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00116-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00130-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00213-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00232-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00266-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00352-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00403-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00423-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-00439-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-01000-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-01001-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-01002-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-01003-RBS-DEM, 2:18-cv-01004-RBS-DEM(clou) |
| Notice of Correction re #3 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Eric L. Bloom, #5 Barry L. Refsin, #7 Maureen S. Lawrence, #4 Alexander J. Egervary and #6 Monica L. Kiley and Certification of Local Counsel Craig C. Reilly: Pro Hac Vice Motions related to 2:18md2836 must be electronically filed in the lead case only. The MDL case manager will add the pro hac vice counsel to the docket sheet upon signature of the Judge. On the application, please specify as to what member cases the pro hac vice attorney should be added. Counsel should not pay a second filing fee. (tlev, ) |
| Filing 7 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Maureen S. Lawrence and Certification of Local Counsel Craig C. Reilly Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6217920. by Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp.. (Reilly, Craig) |
| Filing 6 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Monica L. Kiley and Certification of Local Counsel Craig C. Reilly Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6217884. by Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp.. (Reilly, Craig) |
| Filing 5 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Barry L. Refsin and Certification of Local Counsel Craig C. Reilly Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6217862. by Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp.. (Reilly, Craig) |
| Filing 4 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Alexander J. Egervary and Certification of Local Counsel Craig C. Reilly Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6217853. by Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp.. (Reilly, Craig) |
| Filing 3 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Eric L. Bloom and Certification of Local Counsel Craig C. Reilly Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6217817. by Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp.. (Reilly, Craig) (Main Document 3 replaced on 8/8/2018) (bpet, ). |
| Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. (epri) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Glenmark Generics Inc., U.S.A., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC, Merck & Co., Inc., Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Schering Corp., Schering-Plough Corp. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6214131.), filed by Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., Rite Aid Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(epri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
