Matousek v. Commonwealth of VA
| Susan Neal Matousek |
| Commonwealth of VA |
| 2:2018cv00433 |
| August 9, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Norfolk Office |
| Norfolk City |
| Raymond A Jackson |
| Lawrence R Leonard |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 Request for Hearing by Susan Neal Matousek (epri, ) |
| Filing 23 MOTION by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri, ) |
| Filing 22 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 21 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 20 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri, |
| Filing 19 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Susan Neal Matousek. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(epri) |
| Filing 17 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 18 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 15 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Change of Address by Susan Neal Matousek (epri) |
| Filing 13 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 12 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 11 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 10 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 9 COMPLAINT against Commonwealth of VA, filed by Susan Neal Matousek.(epri) |
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's IFP Application, ECF No. 1, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to file Plaintiff's Complaint. Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE why this action should not be dismissed by filing an Amended Complaint within thirty days of the date of entry of this Order to Show Cause. A copy of this Order was sent to Plaintiff as DIRECTED on 8.29.18 Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 8/28/2018. (epri)
|
| Filing 7 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 6 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 5 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 4 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 3 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 2 Submission by Susan Neal Matousek. (epri) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Susan Neal Matousek. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Attachments)(epri) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/13/2018: #3 Submission) (epri, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/14/2018: #4 Submission) (epri, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Matousek v. Commonwealth of VA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commonwealth of VA | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Susan Neal Matousek | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
