Hanks v. Harvard Collection Services, Inc. et al
| Tendra Hanks |
| John Does 1-25, Harvard Collection Services, Inc. and Pendrick Capital Partners II, LLC |
| 2:2018cv00541 |
| October 8, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert G Doumar |
| Robert J Krask |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 23, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S NOTICE that this matter will be dismissed agreed with prejudice by the Court unless a dismissal order is submitted by counsel within eleven (11) days from the date of this notice. This deadline may be extended only by an order of the Court obtained by counsel. (clou) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Settlement by Tendra Hanks (Stein, Aryeh) |
| Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE TO COUNSEL: Responsive pleadings to the complaint have not been filed by defendant Harvard Collection Services Inc. Counsel is requested to file a status report within fifteen (15) days from the date of this notice. The status report should be in the form of a pleading that conforms to ECF Policies and Procedures.A party seeking reasonable extension of time to respond to the complaint must obtain court approval by filing an appropriate motion with a proposed order. If a party is in default, plaintiff's counsel may file a request for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The request for entry of default should be in the form of a pleading which conforms to ECF Policies and Procedures. (dcou, ) |
| Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons served on Harvard Collection Services Inc. on 10/12/2018, filed by Tendra Hanks. (Attachments: #1 Letter)(dcou, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendants' Harvard Collection Services, Inc. and Pendrick Capital Partners II, LLC, shall have until November 23, 2018. (See order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Krask on 10/31/2018. (clou)
|
| Filing 6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Harvard Collection Services, Inc., John Does 1-25, Pendrick Capital Partners II, LLC. (Prior, Francis) |
| MOTIONS REFERRED to Magistrate Judge: Robert J. Krask. #6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (clou ) |
| Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT re #1 Complaint, #2 Summons Issued, (Affidavit of Service Upon Harvard Collection Services Inc.) by Tendra Hanks. (Stein, Aryeh) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion for Pro hac vice for Yaakov Saks as to Tendra Hanks. Signed by District Judge Robert G. Doumar on 10/16/18. (tlev, )
|
| Filing 3 Motion to appear Pro Hac Vice by Yaakov Saks and Certification of Local Counsel Aryeh E. Stein Filing fee $ 75, receipt number 0422-6313676. by Tendra Hanks. (Stein, Aryeh) |
| Filing 2 Two (2) Summonses Issued as to Harvard Collection Services, Inc., Pendrick Capital Partners II, LLC. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Harvard Collection Services, Inc., John Does 1-25, Pendrick Capital Partners II, LLC ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6306282.), filed by Tendra Hanks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
