Walden v. 3701 Pacific Avenue Associates, LLC
| Ronald W. Walden, Jr. |
| 3701 Pacific Avenue Associates, LLC |
| 2:2019cv00353 |
| July 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Douglas E Miller |
| Rebecca Beach Smith |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 8/27/19. (bpet, )
|
|
Filing 9
Order Rule 16(b) Scheduling Order - Pursuant to the Rule 16(b) Conference it is ordered that the Final Pretrial Conference is set for 2/4/2020 at 10:00 AM in Norfolk. Bench Trial is set for 2/25/2020 at 11:00 AM in Norfolk. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on August 29, 2019. (sche)
|
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by 3701 Pacific Avenue Associates, LLC, Ronald W. Walden, Jr. (sche) |
| Scheduling Conference - Rule 16b held on 8/27/2019. (sche) |
| Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference reset for 8/27/2019 at 09:30 AM in Norfolk - Clerk's Office Conference Room, 1st Floor. (lbax, ) |
|
Filing 7
RULE 26(f) PRETRIAL ORDER: Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference set for 8/28/2019 at 09:30 AM in Norfolk. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller on August 7, 2019. (sche)
|
| Refer for 16(b) (dcou, ) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint by 3701 Pacific Avenue Associates, LLC.(Koch, Barry) |
| Filing 5 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by 3701 Pacific Avenue Associates, LLC. (Koch, Barry) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Barry Randolph Koch on behalf of 3701 Pacific Avenue Associates, LLC (Koch, Barry) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to 3701 Pacific Avenue Associates, LLC. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Ronald W. Walden, Jr. (Waters, Deborah) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6729199.), filed by Ronald W. Walden, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Waters, Deborah) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Walden v. 3701 Pacific Avenue Associates, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ronald W. Walden, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Deborah C. Waters |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: 3701 Pacific Avenue Associates, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Barry Randolph Koch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
