Cahill v. Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Virginia
| Karly R. Cahill |
| Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Virginia |
| 2:2019cv00393 |
| July 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Arenda L Wright Allen |
| Lawrence R Leonard |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Kati Kitts Dean on behalf of Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Virginia (Dean, Kati) |
| Filing 8 Request for Hearing by Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Virginia re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Regnery, Ronald) |
| Filing 7 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Virginia. (Regnery, Ronald) |
| Filing 6 RESPONSE in Opposition re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Karly R. Cahill. (Donner, Michael) |
| Filing 5 Memorandum in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Virginia. (Regnery, Ronald) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Virginia. (Regnery, Ronald) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Virginia. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint by Karly R. Cahill. (Donner, Michael) |
| Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (epri, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0422-6760820.), filed by Karly R Cahill. (Attachments: #1 Letter EEOC Right to Sue letter, #2 Exhibit Magistrate Organizational Chart, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Donner, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Cahill v. Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Virginia | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Karly R. Cahill | |
| Represented By: | Michael Lorraine Donner, Sr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Office of the Executive Secretary of the Supreme Court of the Commonwealth of Virginia | |
| Represented By: | Kati Kitts Dean |
| Represented By: | Ronald Nicholas Regnery |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
