Dagulo v. The United States of America (Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Justice) et al
Mario Raneses Dagulo |
City of Hampton, VA, Steven Lucas, The United States of America (Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Justice) and Lauren C. Murphy |
2:2019cv00695 |
December 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Arenda L Wright Allen |
Lawrence R Leonard |
Civil Rights: Other |
18 U.S.C. ยง 241 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Memorandum in Support by Steven Lucas, The United States of America (Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Justice). (Van Valkenburg, Virginia) |
Filing 12 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw, ECF No. 9, is GRANTED, and the Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate Plaintiff's Motion for Service, ECF No. 6, on the docket of this matter. Plaintiff's Motion to Withdraw and Terminate Individual Defendants, ECF No. 10, is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to terminate Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, ECF No. 4, on the docket of this matter. The Clerk is further DIRECTED to terminate Mr. Lucas and Ms. Murphy as Defendants in this action. Plaintiff's E-Noticing Request, ECF No. 7, is GRANTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to add Plaintiff's e-mail address to this case, and docket this Order in the Court's electronic filing system. Order docketed s DIRECTED on 2.12.2020. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and filed on 2/12/2020. (epri, ) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to City of Hampton, VA, via Cheran Cordell Ivery, Attorney for the City of Hampton, served on 2/3/2020. (epri, ) |
Filing 10 MOTION by Mario Raneses Dagulo. (epri, ) |
Filing 9 MOTION by Mario Raneses Dagulo. (epri, ) |
Filing 8 Summons Reissued as to City of Hampton, VA., via City Attorney Cheran Ivery. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
Filing 7 MOTION for Pro Se E-Noticing by Mario Raneses Dagulo. (epri, ) |
Filing 6 MOTION by Mario Raneses Dagulo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(epri, ) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS ARE SERVED UPON THE DEFENDANTS by Mario Raneses Dagulo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(epri, ) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Compel by Mario Raneses Dagulo. (epri, ) |
Filing 3 Three Summonses Issued as to The United States of America (Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Justice), U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Clerk phoned pro se plaintiff to advise that service packages are ready for pick up. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
Filing 2 Three Summonses Issued as to City of Hampton, VA, Steven Lucas, Lauren C. Murphy. Clerk phoned pro se plaintiff to advise that service packages are ready for pick up. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Hampton, VA, Steven Lucas, Lauren C. Murphy, The United States of America (Department of Veterans Affairs and Department of Justice) ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 24683044160.), filed by Mario Raneses Dagulo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Tab 1, #11 Tab 2, #12 Tab 3, #13 Tab 4, #14 Exhibit 10, #15 Exhibit 11, #16 Exhibit 12, #17 Exhibit 13, #18 Exhibit 14, #19 Exhibit 15, #20 Exhibit 16, #21 Exhibit 17, #22 Exhibit 18, #23 Exhibit 19, #24 Receipt)(epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.