Turner v. Rosenberg
Rhea Christine Turner |
David E. Rosenberg and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
2:2022cv00195 |
May 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Arenda L Wright Allen |
Douglas E Miller |
Assault Libel & Slander |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Rhea Christine Turner. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Weinberg, Matthew) |
Filing 5 Magistrate Judge Notice and Judge's Information to counsel. (epri, ) |
Filing 4 Memorandum in Support re #3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (2020-10-07 Letter), #2 Exhibit B (2020-10-26 Letter), #3 Exhibit C (2021-04-09 Letter), #4 Exhibit D (2021-06-16 Letter), #5 Exhibit E (Declaration of Karen Sicard))(Shean, Daniel) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Shean, Daniel) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA of Substitution of Defendant (Shean, Daniel) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal , filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Complaint), #2 Exhibit B (Deeming Letter), #3 Exhibit C (Certification), #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Shean, Daniel) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen and Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller. (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.