Fowler v. Stolle
William D Fowler |
Kenneth W. Stolle |
2:2022cv00504 |
December 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Elizabeth W Hanes |
Lawrence R Leonard |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Refer for 16(b) (dbra, ) |
Filing 11 Affirmative Defenses and ANSWER to Complaint by Kenneth W. Stolle.(Rosen, Jeff) |
Filing 10 Request for Hearing by Kenneth W. Stolle re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Partial) (Rosen, Jeff) |
Filing 9 Memorandum in Support re #8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Partial) filed by Kenneth W. Stolle. (Rosen, Jeff) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Partial) by Kenneth W. Stolle. (Rosen, Jeff) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response. It is ORDERED that defendant's time to respond to the Complaint be extended to February 3, 2023. Signed by District Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes on 1/9/2023. (dbra, ) |
Filing 6 Memorandum in Support re #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Kenneth W. Stolle. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Rosen, Jeff) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Plaintiff's Complaint by Kenneth W. Stolle. (Rosen, Jeff) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeff Wayne Rosen on behalf of Kenneth W. Stolle (Rosen, Jeff) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Kenneth W. Stolle, NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove the headers and print two duplexed copies of the electronically issued summons for each Defendant. Please serve one copy of the summons and a copy of the Complaint upon each Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the service copy (executed or unexecuted) to your attention and electronically file it using the filing events, Summons Returned Executed or Summons Returned Unexecuted. (Attachments: #1 Civil Motions Procedures)(epri, ) |
Filing 2 Proposed Summons by William D Fowler. (Thetford, William) |
Filing 1 Complaint ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AVAEDC-8695923.), filed by William D Fowler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Thetford, William) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes and Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (epri, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Fowler v. Stolle | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: William D Fowler | |
Represented By: | Harold Robert Showers, Jr. |
Represented By: | James Vance Stallings |
Represented By: | William Randolph Thetford, Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kenneth W. Stolle | |
Represented By: | Jeff Wayne Rosen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.