Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company v. M/T Mackenzie Rose et al
Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company |
Carver Marine Towing, LLC, Coeymans Marine Towing, LLC and M/T Mackenzie Rose |
2:2024cv00407 |
June 25, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Elizabeth W Hanes |
Lawrence R Leonard |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company. Coeymans Marine Towing, LLC waiver sent on 7/17/2024, answer due 9/16/2024. (Chapman, James) |
Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company. Carver Marine Towing, LLC waiver sent on 7/17/2024, answer due 9/16/2024. (Chapman, James) |
Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes and Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leonard. (ptom) |
Filing 2 Financial Interest Disclosure Statement (Local Rule 7.1) by Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company. (Chapman, James) |
Filing 1 Complaint in Admiralty (Verified) ( Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AVAEDC-9599991.), filed by Norfolk And Portsmouth Belt Line Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Chapman, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.