Proffitt v. Astrue
Plaintiff: Dorothy Proffitt
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Case Number: 3:2011cv00310
Filed: May 11, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Office: Richmond Office
County: Spotsylvania
Presiding Judge: James R. Spencer
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 FINAL ORDER denying 10 Motion for Leave to File; denying 11 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 17 Motion to Remand; adopting 20 Report and Recommendation; the decision of the Commissioner shall be REMANDED for further review; the case is CLOSED. Signed by District Judge James R. Spencer on 6/21/12. (kyou, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Proffitt v. Astrue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dorothy Proffitt
Represented By: Bruce Knight Billman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Represented By: Robin Perrin Meier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?