Bishop v. Commissioner of Social Security et al

Plaintiff: Jesse Arthur Bishop
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 3:2013cv00094
Filed: February 14, 2013
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Richmond Office
County: Nottoway
Presiding Judge: Robert E. Payne
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 30, 2013 16 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER denying 7 plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 9 defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; the Report and Recommendations 13 of the Magistrate Judge is adopted; the Commissioner's decision is affirmed. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 12/30/13. (jtho, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bishop v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse Arthur Bishop
Represented By: Charles H. Cuthbert, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.