Waste Management, Inc. et al v. Great Divide Insurance Company et al
Waste Management, Inc., Waste Management of Virginia, Inc., King George Landfill, Inc. and King George Landfill Properties, LLC |
Great Divide Insurance Company, Nautilus Insurance Company and Arthur A. Robinson |
3:2017cv00060 |
January 23, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Richmond Office |
Out of State |
M. Hannah Lauck |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 93 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 04/05/2019. (smej, ) |
Filing 89 MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 03/12/2019. (smej, ) |
Filing 54 MEMORANDUM ORDER. Finding no error in the R&R, the Court: 1) ADOPTS the findings and recommendations set forth in the R&R, (ECF No. 50 ); 2) OVERRULES Defendants' objections; 3) GRANTS IN PART Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 20 ); 4 ) DENIES AS MOOT Defendants' Motion to Drop Robinson, (ECF No. 28 ); 5) DENIES Defendants' Motion to Drop Subsidiaries, (ECF No. 29 ); 6) GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Strike, (ECF No. 37 ); 7) DISMISSES Defendants' Counterclaims I -B, 11-B, IV, and V-B; and, 8) DISMISSES the following Counter-Defendants: Baltimore Refuse Energy Systems Company; Wheelabrator Baltimore, L.P., Wheelabrator Baltimore, Inc.; Wheelabrator Baltimore, L.L.C.; Waste Management of Maryland; Waste Management Disposal Services of Maryland, Inc.; Waste Management National Services, Inc.; Waste Management Services, Inc.; and, Wheelabrator Technologies, Inc. Because the Court dismisses the above Counter-Defendants, the Court DENIES AS MOOT Plai ntiffs' Agreed Motion Regarding Responses to Counterclaim. (ECF No. 47 .) In order to clarify the record, the Court ORDERS Defendants to file an Amended Counterclaim that complies with the R&R as fully adopted. Defendants SHALL file their Amende d Counterclaim by close of business October 10, 2017. The Court further GRANTS Plaintiffs' Agreed Motion Regarding Submission of Answer to Counterclaim, (ECF No. 22 ), and ORDERS Plaintiffs to file their Answer to Defendants' Amended Counterclaim by close of business October 24, 2017. See for complete details. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 10/03/2017. (nbrow) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.