Integrated Global Services, Inc. v. Mayo

Plaintiff: Integrated Global Services, Inc.
Defendant: Michael Mayo
Case Number: 3:2017cv00563
Filed: August 10, 2017
Court: Virginia Eastern District Court
Office: Richmond Office
County: Chesterfield
Presiding Judge: M. Hannah Lauck
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 18:1836
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 13, 2017 23 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION (please see Memorandum Opinion for additional information.) For the foregoing reasons, the Court granted IGS's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. An appropriate order has issued. (See ECF No. 19 .) It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge M. Hannah Lauck on 09/13/2017. (walk, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Integrated Global Services, Inc. v. Mayo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Integrated Global Services, Inc.
Represented By: Igor Mikhaylovich Babichenko
Represented By: Christopher Michael Michalik
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael Mayo
Represented By: Zev Hillel Antell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?