Davis v. Wade et al
Tyreek Davis |
Henrico County Jail West/East, Honorable John K. Honey, Department of Corrections, Officers John Doe 1-6, Wade L. Michael, Michael L. Wade and Officers John Doe 1-6 and Officer Jane Doe |
3:2018cv00548 |
August 10, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
Richmond Office |
Henrico |
Robert E Payne |
Roderick C Young |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Letter mailed to Plaintiff re service information. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER that plaintiff's #1 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS is granted and the plaintiff be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis herein. The Clerk is directed to file the Complaint and to arrange for service. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 9/11/2018. Copy to Pro Se Plaintiff as directed. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tyreek Davis. (Attachments: #1 Envelope).(ccol, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Tyreek Davis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit B (ccol,) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/22/2018) (ccol, ). Modified on 8/22/2018 (ccol, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/22/2018: #2 Exhibit C, #3 Exhibit D, #4 Exhibit E) (ccol, ). Modified docket on 8/22/2018 (ccol, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/22/2018: #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (ccol, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.