Central City Towing, LLC v. Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc.
| Central City Towing, LLC |
| Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Rentention Group, Inc. and Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc. |
| 3:2018cv00830 |
| December 3, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| Robert E Payne |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT. The Court having made these findings and determining it proper to do so does hereby enter an Order granting Judgment in favor of Central City Towing, LLC against Spirit as follows and in the following amounts: a. Amount due CCT on account of the W&G Transportation, Inc. judgment and for accident remediation and mitigation services described herein: $142,000.00. b.Costs incurred prosecuting this action: filing fee and service costs $860.00. c.Attorney's fees: N/A. d. Interest from the date of Entry of this Default Judgment Order at the rate set forth by 28 USC 1961 at the rate of 2.59% per annum from the date this Order is entered until the judgment is paid in full. It is so ORDERED. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 01/31/2019. (smej, )
|
| Filing 10 Memorandum in Support re #9 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc. filed by Central City Towing, LLC. (Gill, S.) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Default Judgment as to Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc. by Central City Towing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Chris Ward, #2 Proposed Order for Default Judgment, #3 Exhibit A to Proposed Order for Default Judgment)(Gill, S.) |
| Filing 8 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc. (smej, ) |
| Filing 7 AFFIDAVIT re #5 Request for Entry of Default as to Defendant Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc. by Central City Towing, LLC. (Gill, S.) |
| Notice of Correction re #5 Request for Entry of Default: Clerk notified filing attorney of proper filing procedures for requesting default. Clerk has corrected the docket entry. (smej, ) |
| Filing 6 Memorandum in Support re #5 Request for Entry of Default as to Defendant Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc. filed by Central City Towing, LLC. (Gill, S.) Modified to correct docket text on 1/10/2019 (smej, ). |
| Filing 5 Request for Entry of Default as to Defendant Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc. by Central City Towing, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gill, S.) Modified to correct docket event and docket text on 1/10/2019 (smej, ). |
| Filing 4 Certificate of Compliance as to Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc. served on 12/18/2018, answer due 1/8/2019. (smej, ) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Retention Group, Inc. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: REMOVER HEADERS and print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (smej, ) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Central City Towing, LLC. (Gill, S.) |
| Case Assigned to District Judge Robert E. Payne. (smej, ) |
| Filing 1 Complaint (Filing fee: $400, receipt number: 0422-6389499), filed by Spirit Commercial Auto Risk Rentention Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Gill, S.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
