Fitzgibbon v. Institute For Public Accuracy
Plaintiff: Trevor Fitzgibbon
Defendant: Institute For Public Accuracy
Case Number: 3:2019cv00102
Filed: February 14, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: Robert E Payne
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2019 Notice of Correction re: #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint; Clerk left a voice mail message with filing attorney indicating the correct way to submit a "Proposed Order" or a "Joint Consent Order" for the Judge's consideration. (sbea, )
April 8, 2019 Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re: #1 Complaint, by Institute For Public Accuracy. (Attachment: #1 Proposed Order)(Jones, Christopher). Clerk replaced Proposed Order on 4/11/2019. NEF was regenerated. Modified docket text on 4/11/2019 (sbea, ).
March 20, 2019 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; Institute For Public Accuracy waiver sent on 3/6/2019, answer due 5/6/2019. (Attachment: #1 Letter). (sbea, )
February 20, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Institute For Public Accuracy. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: Please remove headers and print out two copies of the electronically issued summons for the Defendant. Serve one copy of the summons and one copy of the Complaint upon the Defendant. Please ensure that your process server returns the additional copy of the summons for the Defendant (executed or unexecuted) on paper to the Clerk's Office. (sbea, )
February 19, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons re #1 Complaint, by Trevor Fitzgibbon. (Biss, Steven)
February 14, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint AgainstInstitute For Public Accuracy (Filing Fee: $400, Receipt Number: 0422-6494763), filed by Trevor Fitzgibbon. (Attachment: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Biss, Steven). Clerk replaced complaint to include civil action number and replaced the civil cover sheet with properly saved format on 2/14/2019. NEF was regenerated. Modified docket text on 2/14/2019 (sbea, ).
February 14, 2019 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge Robert E. Payne. (sbea, )
February 14, 2019 Notice of Correction re: #1 Complaint; Clerk notified filing attorney of proper filing procedures for the "Initial Complaint". Clerk corrected demand amount, replaced complaint to include civil action number and replaced the civil cover sheet with properly saved format. Attorney was requested to file "Proposed Summons" as a separate docket entry. No further action is required at this time. NEF was regenerated. (sbea, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fitzgibbon v. Institute For Public Accuracy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trevor Fitzgibbon
Represented By: Steven Scott Biss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Institute For Public Accuracy
Represented By: Christopher Kendal Jones
Represented By: Douglas Aaron Winegardner
Represented By: Douglas Pendleton Rucker, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?