Baughman v. Oak Health Care Investors of Richmond, Virginia, Inc., et al.
Plaintiff: Tommy Baughman
Defendant: Laurel Health Care Company, Laurel Health Care Holdings, Inc. and Oak Health Care Investors of Richmond, Virginia, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2019cv00355
Filed: May 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia
Presiding Judge: M Hannah Lauck
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 19, 2019 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Laurel Health Care Company waiver sent on 6/19/2019, answer due 8/19/2019. (Byrne, Sean) Modified to correct docket text on 6/20/2019 (smej, ).
June 19, 2019 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Laurel Health Care Holdings, Inc. waiver sent on 6/19/2019, answer due 8/19/2019. (Byrne, Sean) Modified to correct docket text on 6/20/2019 (smej, ).
June 19, 2019 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Oak Health Care Investors of Richmond, Virginia, Inc. waiver sent on 6/19/2019, answer due 8/19/2019. (Byrne, Sean) Modified to correct docket text on 6/20/2019 (smej, ).
May 30, 2019 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Laurel Health Care Company, Laurel Health Care Holdings, Inc., Oak Health Care Investors of Richmond, Virginia, Inc.. NOTICE TO ATTORNEY: REMOVE HEADERS and print out two electronically issued summons and one copy of the attachments for each defendant to be served with the complaint. (smej, )
May 28, 2019 Filing 4 Proposed Summons by Tommy Baughman. (Anderson, Peter)
May 28, 2019 Filing 3 Proposed Summons by Tommy Baughman. (Anderson, Peter)
May 28, 2019 Filing 2 Proposed Summons by Tommy Baughman. (Anderson, Peter)
May 13, 2019 Filing 1 Complaint (Filing Fee: $400, Receipt Number: 0422-6636210), filed by Tommy Baughman. (Anderson, Peter)
May 13, 2019 Initial Case Assignment to District Judge M. Hannah Lauck. (smej, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baughman v. Oak Health Care Investors of Richmond, Virginia, Inc., et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tommy Baughman
Represented By: Peter Thomas Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laurel Health Care Company
Represented By: Sean Patrick Byrne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laurel Health Care Holdings, Inc.
Represented By: Sean Patrick Byrne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oak Health Care Investors of Richmond, Virginia, Inc.
Represented By: Sean Patrick Byrne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?