Hall v. Anderson
| Tacitus Hall |
| Timothy V. Anderson, James Mathers and William I. F. Collins |
| 3:2019cv00749 |
| October 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John A Gibney |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Mail sent to Tacitus Hall returned as undeliverable. (jsmi, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER. This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiffs updated amended complaint #7 and motion for a temporary restraining order and injunction to stop a non-judicial foreclosure action and eviction #8 . Because the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action, the Court DISMISSES the plaintiffs updated amended complaint WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court lacks jurisdiction to rule on the motion for a temporary restraining order or injunction. Accordingly, the Court DIRECTS the Clerk to terminate the motion #8 . Plaintiff notified of right to appeal. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 11/19/19. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (jsau, )
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for TRO Injunction Opposing Wrongful Non-Judicial Foreclosure Action/Deed & Eviction/Action, by Tacitus Hall. (Attachments: #1 Rule 83.1(M) Certification (Typed))(jsau, ) |
| Filing 7 Updated AMENDED COMPLAINT against Timothy V. Anderson, William I. F. Collins, James Mathers, filed by Tacitus Hall. (Attachments: #1 Unmarked Attachment, #2 Rule 83.1(M) Certification (Typed))(jsau, ) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER. This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiffs amended complaint #4 and motion for a temporary restraining order and injunction to stop a non-judicial foreclosure action #5 . Because the Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over this action, the Court DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The Court lacks jurisdiction to rule on the motion for a temporary restraining order or injunction #5 . Plaintiff notified of right to appeal. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 11/15/19. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (jsau, )
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for TRO Injunction Opposing Wrongful Non-Judicial Foreclosure Action/Deed, by Tacitus Hall. (Attachments: #1 Rule 83.1(M) Certification)(jsau, ) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Timothy V. Anderson, William I. F. Collins, James Mathers, filed by Tacitus Hall. (Attachments: #1 Unmarked Attachment, #2 Typed Rule 83.1(M) Certification, #3 Rule 83.1(M) Certification)(jsau, ) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Timothy V. Anderson, filed by Tacitus Hall. #1 Unmarked Attachment) .jsau, ) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER. This matter comes before the Court on the plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis #1 . Upon due consideration, the Court FINDS the plaintiff unable to pay the costs of proceeding in this case. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the plaintiffs motion and DIRECTS the Clerk to docket the complaint. Further, for reasons stated herein, the Court DIRECTS the plaintiff to file an amended complaint within twenty-one (21) days of this Order. See Order for complete details. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr. on 10/18/19. Copy mailed to plaintiff. (jsau, )
|
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tacitus Hall. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint, #2 Attachment)(jsau, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
