Purvis v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Antoine E. Purvis |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA (Social Security Administration) |
| 3:2020cv00326 |
| May 7, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia |
| John A Gibney |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER - Effective immediately, if all parties in a Social Security Appeal consent to have the matter heard by a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the matter shall be reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes for all purposes. If the parties do not consent to have the matter heard by a United States Magistrate Judge, the case shall be referred to Judge Hanes for Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B). Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 06/19/2020. (tjoh, ) (Copy mailed to plaintiff).
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General and mailed to plaintiff with return of service instructions, a copy of the Pro Se Handbook and a copy of Rule 4. (tjoh, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 400 paid), filed by Antoine E. Purvis. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2, #3 Attachment 3, #4 Local Rule 83.1 (Unsigned))(tjoh, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Virginia Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
